Saturday, August 21, 2010

Sheesh Mahal (1950) - Modi-drama

sheesh_m00001 It’s always nice to see a 40s heroine who isn’t raring to martyr herself on the altar of duty, especially when the film co-stars my favourite - Sohrab Modi. I can see that you’re pointing an accusing finger at the film’s release date, which is, admittedly 1950. But I assure you, this film really does not feel like a 50s film. My womanly intuition tells me that this was shot in 1949. And no, I do not need anybody to ruin my beautiful theory with ugly facts.

Now that we’re all agreed that it’s a 40s film, let’s examine this unusual heroine. She has all the attributes of a "good" woman. Dutiful? Check. Conscious of her family’s izzat (honor)? Check. Always sticking to the straight and narrow and making sure that others do, too? Check. But unlike a lot of other Bhartiya naaris, she does not suffer in silence. She is also educated, independent, sassy and not entirely above modern ideas. Which does not mean that she is a feminist - she is Bolly-naari, after all. But she does her bit to restore my faith in 40s/50s Indian womanhood. The character is named Ranjana, and is played by Naseem Banu. Let’s see what she gets up to…


Thakur Jaspal Singh (Sohrab Modi) comes from a long and illustrious line of Thakurs. That means only one thing in Bolly-land – he is proud of his lineage and zealously devoted to keeping up the family’s izzat in the come-what-may style. That he is up to his ears in debt, and close to loosing his lovely mansion - the titular Sheesh Mahal - does nothing to cramp his style. He donates lavishly to charity, rudely refuses to contemplate a match between his daughter Ranjana (Naseem Banu) and his chief creditor’s son, plans to celebrate Diwali like a minor King, and shuts his ears to his children’s entreaties to live within his means. But that isn’t the sum of his follies. He believes in the Thakur honour to such an extent that he’s married off his elder daughter Nalini (Pushpa Hans) into an impoverished Thakur family and she’s been subject to untold suffering as a result.
A letter from the suffering Nalini moves Ranjana to tears, and her brother Balram (Amarnath?) to helpless anger. Balram never wanted Nalini to be married into a poor family, but Jaspal is firm in his belief that a proud lineage is more important than wealth. Now, he bids Balram to fetch Nalini and her family for Sheesh Mahal’s lavish Diwali celebrations. Balram is happy to fetch his sister, but tries to get his father to scale back on the festivities. Ranjana and he have heard that their father’s chief creditor has declared a foreclosure and will get Sheesh Mahal auctioned. But Jaspal is unmoved – he’s filed a case in court and everything will be fine! Ranjana and Balram shut up, and plunge into the festivities. Nalini joins in with her young son, and bemoans the poverty that has brought illness to her husband and starvation to her little one. Ranjana and Balram soon enlighten her about the true state-of-affairs at Sheesh Mahal.
Along come the troubles, thick and fast. First comes the news of Nalini’s husband’s death. Then, Sheesh Mahal is auctioned. They shift to a small house and try to make ends meet with Balram’s earnings as a factory worker. Ranjana’s fiancĂ© Sundarmukh (Pran) breaks their engagement, because he has no interest in marrying a poor Thakur’s daughter, no matter how proud her lineage. Then Balram looses a leg in an accident and their only source of income is gone.
Through all this, Jaspal firmly refuses to let Ranjana get a job because the women in his family never work! If Balram cannot work, he will paint and sell his paintings. In the meantime they must all survive – on air, I assume! Needless to say, I was all ready to administer some much needed smacks to Mr. Thakur Jaspal Singh. But Ranjana took action herself. Instead of trying to batter some sense into her father’s head, she sought a teaching job. As luck would have it, she lands a better paying job as a companion to Rupa (Nigar Sultana), the spoilt daughter of the new owner of Sheesh Mahal - Durgaprasad (Mubarak). Ranjana then goes home and presents her family with fait accompli. The smart girl does not reveal the name of her employer, but does assure her father that she will keep her proud lineage a secret. Jaspal is not reconciled, but withdraws his opposition when Ranjana entreats him on behalf of Nalini’s half-starving child.
Ranjana starts her job in Sheesh Mahal, and makes an instant hit with Rupa and her Mom (a very young Leela Mishra). The son of the house - Vikram (Jawahar Kaul) – is much struck by her beauty, but when she tells him off for being rude to her, he isn’t quite so smitten anymore. His vague affront hardens into dislike when he discovers a letter calling her to an assignation later that night. He follows her to her assignation, and discovers his mistake. The letter was written to Rupa and Ranjana discovered it in the pocket of her dressing gown while ironing it. She then kept the tryst in Rupa's stead, by the simple expedient of locking the latter up in her bedroom!
At the tryst, Ranjana discovers that Rupa’s lover is her own ex-fiancĂ©, Sundarmukh! She quickly veils herself and tells him that Rupa sent her to drive him away. And she does drive him away - with the help of their dog Bahadur. But Rupa is very much in love with Sundarmukh’s sundar mukh (pretty face), and unlikely to submit to her arranged-marriage groom. She rings up Sundarmukh and the two plan to elope. Sundarmukh thinks like the villain of a regency romance - her wealthy parents will have to accept the marriage once it’s been accomplished. The elopement is planned for the one night in the week when Ranjana is away, visiting her family. But luck is against the lovers. Her father’s distressing cough prompts Ranjana to come over to Sheesh Mahal to borrow some of Mrs. Durgaprasad’s cough medicine. And she is just in time to intercept Rupa and dissuade her from eloping.
Rupa submits to Ranjana’s arguments against an elopement, but fiercely resents being forced into a marriage with someone else. Will Ranjana be able to convince her that marriage with Pran Sundarmukh is a fate-worse-than-death? How will she evade her own troubles? After she frustrated Rupa’s elopement, the grateful Durgprasad sent her home in his limousine and Mrs. Durgaprasad lent her an expensive shawl to keep warm on the way. Jaspal sees both and immediately jumps to the conclusion that Ranjana has been performing dishonourable service for her employer! Will she be able to escape his Thakur-wrath? Will Vikram ever tell Ranjana about his growing feelings for her? Will the lovely Nalini stop singing sad songs? And most importantly, will somebody finally whack some sense into the annoying Thakur Jaspal Singh? All your questions will be answered - just visit Sheesh Mahal. :D
The performances are very stagey, in the way of pre-50s films. That, and the music, give it the distinct feel of a 40s film. For the rest, it’s a fairly progressive film. While Jaspal represents the worst of silly, retrogressive ideas, the rest of the characters stand up very articulately for sensible and modern ideas. Apart from being peopled with likeable characters, it's also a very fast-paced story with great dialogues, lavish sets, lots of beautiful people, and lovely songs. This being a Sohrab Modi film, there are lots of long speeches, usually delivered by him in his booming voice. He does spout the most annoying nonsense about honour and pride, but I must confess that I love the way he delivers his lines! Besides, since the film is staunchly against the views his character espouses, those speeches aren’t really all that annoying, after all.
And don’t forget to check out Pran in an unusual romantic duet...

23 comments:

  1. Ever since Richard posted that Pran song on his blog, I've been wanting to see this film. And - what a coincidence - today I'd been thinking of this, because I happened to have gone on a historical walk to a Sheesh Mahal in Delhi (in Shalimar Bagh). Hmm. All the omens say I have to see this soon!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, it does seem like fate is pointing you towards Sheesh Mahal! :D

    What was your Sheesh Mahal like? Any mirrors about? Or was that just a name?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Quite a progressive film for the 40s. And a feisty woman lead. Thank you for this and the link to the film. Will watch it soon. Sounds like fun :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. And I was under the impression that Sheesh Mahal was a historical movie like several others that Sohrab Modi produced. Who knew that within some two years he was to produce a historical that would give him a blow from which he would never recover. Hmm.

    Thanks for the review Bollyviewer. And yes, Naseem Banu still looks beautiful despite having passed her prime.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sharmi, she is actually assertive, independent and sensible - something I find a whole lot more admirable than feisty! Hope you enjoy it.

    Nasir, it isn't a historical, but the sets and locations are still very lavish with lots of beautiful detail.

    Naseem Banu was only about 34 when this film released - that is hardly past her prime! Madubala was about the same age (36) when she died, and we all think that she died young!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Where do you find such oldies? After reading your review about the heroine's role, I too want to see this movie!

    ReplyDelete
  7. @bollyviewer: The Sheesh Mahal I went to see is probably that just in name - not a mirror in sight. Of course, it could well be that it had been mirrored at the time Shahjahan built it, but it seems unlikely.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Even I always thought this was a historical film. And I somehow keep forgetting that Mera piya gaye rangoon is from this movie.
    Remember I had asked for the songs picturised on Pran sometime back in one of my posts. I came across Jise dhoondti phirti hai meri nazar then. And have been wanting to see this ever since.
    Educated, independent, sensible girl and someone who doesn't suffer in silence!!! Then it's a must watch.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I actually think film heroines before the mid-fifties or so were better off in general than the ones after that. Lots of them are feisty and not nearly as oppressed (the films have better messages). Not all of course but generally speaking I'd rather have been a heroine in the 30s/40s than the 60s/70s...

    This looks lovely. Probably isn't available with subtitles though :-\

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hello,
    I saw Sheesh Mahal today from the link you've posted here. And yes, it was an engaging film. Much that I was exasperated with Jaspal Singh's idiotic beliefs, I loved watching Ranjana and Rupa. While Ranjana was smart yet soft, Rupa was sassy yet foolish. I was quite taken aback by the fact that Naseem Banu was so good looking even though she was not very young. Then I read her up in the internet and saw that she was basically a prima donna in the 30s and 40s. That makes her quite old in 1950. But still she was remarkably beautiful and had a unique voice. I loved it when she called the dog saying, "Come Bahadur, catch him."
    Saying this, I feel she deserved to be married (in the film) to a better looking man. That Vikram is sickly. And Balaram spoke in such a sing-song manner.
    I almost felt like wringing Jaspal Singh's neck towards the end. (I also read that Sohrab Modi had an affair with Naseem Banu. Is that true?)
    Despite all the weak men, the film was good. Thank you once again.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Filmbuff, I have my sources (Rhythm House, Induna, etc., and bollywood torrents)! :D You can watch this online. Shemaroo has uploaded it on youtube - here.

    dustedoff, that sounds like Sohrab Modi's Sheesh Mahal - what it lacked in the mirror department, it more than made up for in the Mahal department!

    sunheriyaadein, Mere piya gaye Rangoon is from another film - Patanga - that also stars Nigar Sultana. So when I saw her on the phone in this film, I couldn't resist that caption!

    memsaab, the 40s had their share of oppressed and weepy women! The ones that come immediately to mind are Nargis in Andaaz whom I wanted to slap some sense into, and Mumtaz Shanti in Ghar Ki Izzat who had a severe martyr complex. But the 60s never had anybody like Durga Khote's Queen Mrinalvati (Prithvi Vallabh) or Shanta Apte's Nirmala (Duniya Na Maane) - so maybe the 60s were more regressive.

    Sharmi, I am glad you liked the film! Jawahar Kaul, who played Vikram, is very good looking in other films like Dekh Kabira Roya. Here, he just had too much make-up on and the moustache did not improve things. So, I really don't think that Naseem got a bad bargain! ;D

    ReplyDelete
  12. its always lovely to discover a Pran song, and he looks so handsome in that song, what a gent. I'm looking at putting out a list sometime. Is it me or does it look like Shemaroo superimposed their logo over that of Nupur

    ReplyDelete
  13. I loved your screencap 'Tragedy version 3.0.1' :)

    Must see this film. I've only ever seen Sohrab Modi historicals.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Nice review as always. You've inspired [I was going to say "shamed" but that seems too harsh - on me!:-)] me to pull out my Sheesh Mahal DVD and watch it.

    ReplyDelete
  15. bollywooddeewana, I was thinking of making a Pran list, too - he lip-synced to some great songs and Jise dhoondti phirti hai meri nazar would be a great addition to that list!

    Banno, Sohrab Modi does a lot better in historicals. They give him much more scope for his speeches!

    Shalini, I'm surprised! The film has such a lovely and terribly underrated score that I was sure you must have seen it already. :D

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hey, talking about song lists, ages ago I sent you an email with a request to have some "nauka" songs with some suggestions of mine. Has your list filled up for a post? or do u want me to do one and send?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Was that you? You left the comment as "Anonymous"!

    I do have 10 songs for a list, but more will definitely be welcome. I just need to find time to sit down and write it up.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Yep it was me. Those days I used to post as Anonymous before I got my netname!

    I think I already suggested some nauka songs like - Sun mere bandu re from Sujatha (1950s), the song from Bandini also (1950s), Sawan ka maheena - Milan (1960s), Tujko chalna hoga - Safar (1970s), O Maji Re Nadiya Kinara (Khusboo) (1970s),there is also a Rajshri movie of the 70s - forgetting the name - it is an oriya story with Zarina Wahab and an oriya hero who is a boat builder in the movie which has some nauka songs, 1980s? , 1990s?, I think the 2000 one could be from Kaho Na Pyar Hai tho technically not a nauka song but chalega, also a song from the recent Ajay Devgan - Kajol movie - U me aur Hum.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Just for Pyaar ki kashti mein hain I will extend the range of my nauka songs beyond the 70s. :D

    One nauka songs' post coming soon - once I am through with the somewhat unofficial Flynn-week!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Two more nauka songs - maji nahiya doondhey kinara from Uphaar and Jis Gali Mein Tera Ghar No Ho Balama from Kati Patang.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Filmbuff thanks for the Uphaar song. I was trying to remember what it was, all day today. Now I know! :D

    ReplyDelete
  22. the 40s and 50s films are somehow more sensible than the 80s and 90s!
    the songs are all so nice and naseem bnau does look jus tgreatt here!

    ReplyDelete
  23. There was no Mr. Bharat around to teach them Bhartiya sanskriti - so they were probably very "Westernised" in the 40s and 50s! ;D

    ReplyDelete